Just trying to wrap my head around this, why if I pay a 2-3x multiple on Adjusted EBITDA would I then ALSO pay for the Accounts Receivable-Accounts Payable on top of that if that AR and AP was used to generate the EBITDA I’m already paying for. Is it not double dipping?
Inventory I understand more because the product has yet to be sold and moved to the Income Statement, however, the Sales on AR are already on the Profit & loss and factored into the EBITDA. Any idea why you would pay for AR on top of a multiple?
Added Context: I understand AR is cash to be collected but if we’re looking at Accrual Net Income this is already factored in as part of Sales which flows into the EBITDA multiple
submitted by /u/a_r623
[link] [comments]
Leave a Reply